A policy organization’s output is a permanent, citable public record — and it sits on infrastructure most institutes have never examined. We host research publishing on servers we own in the United States, provide staff email on your own domain from $1.95 per user a month, and send donor email from our own SMTP infrastructure, billed on sends rather than list size. For organizations that work on contested questions, knowing who can switch your archive off is not a hypothetical.
A policy paper is cited for years. URLs that break, PDFs that move and archives that get reorganised quietly destroy the value of past work. We build publishing structures designed to stay put.
Scholar pages, program areas, topic archives and a media room that a journalist on deadline can actually use. Most institute sites make the last one impossible.
Data centers we own and operate in the United States. For an organization whose work is contested by design, the question of who can remove it is worth answering before it is asked.
Staff, fellows, visiting scholars and board members. Liberation Email from $1.95 per user a month, Mail Pro at $7.95.
Draft research, litigation materials, board papers and donor records that should not be moving as email attachments. Hub for Teams at $7.49 per user a month.
Legal advocacy organizations hold privileged and confidential material with real consequences attached. Access control, logging and a clean revocation process matter more here than in most nonprofits.
A continuity plan that stops at hosting misses the vendor most likely to end your ability to reach supporters.
Registrar, DNS, host, email, payment processor, list platform. Any one of them can end your ability to publish, raise money or reach your list. Most organizations have never mapped which vendor holds which.
Platforms, ad accounts and social presences can all disappear. A list you own and can export reaches your supporters regardless. It is also the cheapest thing on this page.
Export formats and an exit path documented when you sign, not negotiated during a dispute. We will put it in writing, and you should ask every vendor you use for the same.
This is the section most vendors will not write for you.
Because your published work is a citable public record with a long life, and because organizations working on contested questions have a genuine interest in knowing who controls their archive, their domain and their list.
We do. Liberation Campaign runs on our own SMTP servers and our own software, with no third-party relay in a position to override our policy. Ask your current platform the same question — many cannot answer it.
Every existing URL is redirected permanently to its new address, so citations, links and search rankings follow. Broken citations are the main cost of a badly run migration for an institute.
Very little, because billing is on emails sent rather than contacts stored. An institute with a 60,000-name list that mails quarterly pays for those sends, not for holding the names.
Yes, and it should be treated that way. Privileged material needs access control, logging and clean revocation, and it should not be moving as email attachments.
Yes, at the start. Your data and your export path are documented when you sign. You should ask the same of every vendor holding something you cannot rebuild.
Bring us your registrar, host, email, processor and list platform. We will map what each one controls, what it would cost you to lose, and what moving would involve.
Don’t like managing? We offer managed services for hosting, ecommerce, web sites, and more.
Liberation’s global edge network provides enhanced performance & security.
Stay informed on the latest tech news, new products, promotions, & more!